How it works

Initial screening

Every opportunity begins with a structured screening against minimum thresholds for deal size, sponsor track record, and sector alignment. This stage eliminates unsuitable options before deeper analysis begins.

Due diligence

Qualified deals move into a detailed review of financial models, legal structures, and governance terms. Analysts compare projected outcomes against historical benchmarks and stress-test assumptions.

team reviewing investment documents

Final allocation

Approved participants receive documentation outlining their commitment, fee schedule, and reporting cadence. Capital is deployed only after all parties confirm alignment on terms.

partners finalizing agreement
Ready to explore how direct participation could fit into your broader allocation approach? The team is available to walk through the process in detail.

Common misconceptions

Many assume co-investing demands institutional-scale capital or insider connections. In practice, minimum commitments vary widely, and structured vehicles now open access beyond traditional gatekeepers. Another myth holds that reduced fees automatically mean better outcomes. While fee savings matter, the quality of due diligence and the alignment of interests between sponsor and participant remain the decisive variables. A third misconception suggests these deals carry no downside. Every direct allocation involves exposure to the underlying asset, and participants should expect the same volatility as the primary fund, concentrated in a single transaction rather than spread across a portfolio.

What to evaluate

Before committing, examine four dimensions: the sponsor's realized performance across prior funds, not just marketed returns; the specific rights and protections embedded in the deal documents; the liquidity profile and expected holding period; and how this single allocation interacts with existing holdings. A deal that looks attractive in isolation may distort sector concentration or extend average duration beyond comfort levels. The discipline lies in assessing fit within the broader picture, not judging the transaction on its own merits.

Deal types

Opportunities span several structures and sectors

Risk considerations

Direct participation concentrates exposure in a single transaction rather than diversifying across a fund portfolio. This amplifies both upside potential and downside risk. Participants should also consider the illiquidity typical of private structures, where exit timing depends on sponsor decisions or market conditions rather than individual choice. Governance rights vary by deal; some offerings include board representation, while others limit participants to information rights with no operational influence. Understanding these trade-offs before committing capital is essential to avoiding mismatched expectations.

Why direct participation

A growing segment of investors wants deal-level transparency without building an internal private equity team

Brellaqivor connects qualified individuals with vetted co-investment opportunities alongside established sponsors. The focus remains on thorough evaluation, clear documentation, and alignment of interests rather than volume or speed. Each opportunity undergoes the same analytical review applied to institutional commitments, adapted for participants making direct allocations.

consultant reviewing documents with client

Evaluation framework

analyst reviewing financial data

Sponsor history

Review the general partner's track record across multiple funds and market cycles, focusing on realized returns rather than unrealized valuations.

Deal terms

Examine fee structures, preferred return hurdles, catch-up provisions, and the specific rights granted to co-investors in this transaction.

team discussing investment terms

Sector dynamics

Assess competitive positioning, regulatory environment, and demand drivers that could affect the asset's performance over the expected holding period.

Portfolio fit

Evaluate how this single commitment affects overall concentration, liquidity, and correlation with existing holdings.

Learn more
cookie consent notification banner

Cookie Notice

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and understand where visitors come from. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies.